Have we reached the minimum size limits for analog IP?
Posted by Navraj Nandra on November 19th, 2009
In the last couple of postings I discussed technology scaling and it’s impact on analog IP. The point is that like digital gates, analog IP benefits from technology scaling but with a very different methodology – not using design tools but using different analog architectures: http://synopsysoc.org/theeyeshaveit/?p=242 illustrated USB 2.0 PHY scaling from 180 nm to 28 nm and http://synopsysoc.org/theeyeshaveit/?p=273 showed the example of a dual 10-bit, 80 MHz ADC in an 180 nm technology being five times smaller in 65 nm. So, if we go below 32/28 nm, will we continue to see this size reduction in analog IP?
Is there a size limit?
Our conjecture is that area improvements will happen, but not at the dramatic level as in the 180 nm to 65 nm example above. A couple of reasons for this:
- The advantages of moving from I/O devices to core devices has already been achieved with 65 nm technologies. Moving forward it will become harder and harder to design using sub-1V supplies and the designs will become more complicated in order to yield good performance at those low voltages. Most likely there will be only two transistors stacked with many more placed laterally.
- The converters are now a very small fraction of the complete SoC area, even if, in some cases, multiple instantiations of the converter are used (for example, MIMO transceivers). Therefore there maybe no market driver/need
Of course, I’m saying this from today’s perspective. With new structures like finFET’s area and power may be further reduced.










I built my first crystal radio at about the age of ten (had help with the soldering iron) and have been dabbling in the analog electronics field ever since. The "James Brown of Analog": I do like James Brown and have I been working in the electronics industry for many years. I’m also a big fan of Reggae and Ska and spent my youth listening to John Peel on Radio 1. Ken Boothe is the greatest singer. Running is a passion. Squaw Valley is the best place to ski. Ever!
November 20th, 2009 at 2:13 am
Hello, do you think that this area reduction will bring us cost reduction proportionally? Please take the USB PHY as example: do you have cost data?
BR
Tao